Patent & Trade Mark
Attorneys
We are
Experts in Navigating IP in the Asia Pacific Region
Thanks to many years of global experience, FB Rice has a network of trusted advisors in all key jurisdictions. We turn to those advisors when assisting our clients to promote their interests.

For specific information on our Asia Pacific capability, click here.

 

 
One door to South East Asia
For a seamless service for filing and prosecuting patent and trade mark applications in South East Asia, click here.

 

Joanne Martin

Partner

Joanne Martin
"Many Australian businesses look to China as offering opportunities for business growth both in China and globally. China is recognised as a complex and challenging market, however businesses trading successfully with China tend to be more competitive both domestically and in the international market in response to those learnings."
"Many Australian businesses look to China as offering opportunities for business growth both in China and globally. China is recognised as a complex and challenging market, however businesses trading successfully with China tend to be more competitive both domestically and in the international market in response to those learnings."
Inventorship – a muddy concept at best
Inventorship has been described as “one of muddiest concepts in the muddy metaphysics of the patent law.” Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, Inc., 352 F.Supp. 1357, 1372 (E.D.Pa. 1972). Determining inventorship is a complex issue that is undertaken on a much stricter basis than authorship of a scientific publication. It can also be a particularly contentious issue when people are not named as inventors. Not only can this lead to alienation, but it can also lead to legal issues. For example, a patent may be invalid if incorrect inventors are intentionally named. During litigation, a defendant may also be able to identify an unnamed inventor and obtain an assignment from them, thereby qualifying as a co-owner of the patent and no longer subject to the litigation.
Inventorship has been described as “one of muddiest concepts in the muddy metaphysics of the patent law.” Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, Inc., 352 F.Supp. 1357, 1372 (E.D.Pa. 1972). Determining inventorship is a complex issue that is undertaken on a much stricter basis than authorship of a scientific publication. It can also be a particularly contentious issue when people are not named as inventors. Not only can this lead to alienation, but it can also lead to legal issues. For example, a patent may be invalid if incorrect inventors are intentionally named. During litigation, a defendant may also be able to identify an unnamed inventor and obtain an assignment from them, thereby qualifying as a co-owner of the patent and no longer subject to the litigation.
28 June 2017
David Herman | Chairing Industry Session at the 8th International Nanomedicine Conference
David Herman is looking forward to chairing the Industry Session at the 8th International Nanomedicine Conference in Sydney next week (3-5 July).
David Herman is looking forward to chairing the Industry Session at the 8th International Nanomedicine Conference in Sydney next week (3-5 July).
Marianne Repacholi

Patent Attorney

Marianne Repacholi
Marianne is a Patent Attorney in the Melbourne Chemistry group, having joined in 2013 as a Trainee Attorney. With extensive experience in Australian and New Zealand patent prosecution and patent portfolio management, she intuitively operationalises client objectives to enhance their capacity to leverage intellectual property assets across key international markets.
Marianne is a Patent Attorney in the Melbourne Chemistry group, having joined in 2013 as a Trainee Attorney. With extensive experience in Australian and New Zealand patent prosecution and patent portfolio management, she intuitively operationalises client objectives to enhance their capacity to leverage intellectual property assets across key international markets.
25 May 2017
FB Rice Perth welcomes new staff members
FB Rice is delighted to announce new additions to their Perth office – Associate Carol Kane and Trainee Attorney Otto Saha. Both Carol and Otto join the firm at a period of continued growth in Perth, where FB Rice continues to meet the needs of their local client base.
FB Rice is delighted to announce new additions to their Perth office – Associate Carol Kane and Trainee Attorney Otto Saha. Both Carol and Otto join the firm at a period of continued growth in Perth, where FB Rice continues to meet the needs of their local client base.
WIPOs First Millionaire | Chinese Patent Filings Break New Record
WIPO has published its World Intellectual Property Indicators 2016 report, which details a healthy growth of intellectual property filings in 2015. Overall, the statistics demonstrate a positive trend in global innovation for the year, with patent filings increasing by 7.8% and trade mark filings increasing by a staggering 15.3%.
WIPO has published its World Intellectual Property Indicators 2016 report, which details a healthy growth of intellectual property filings in 2015. Overall, the statistics demonstrate a positive trend in global innovation for the year, with patent filings increasing by 7.8% and trade mark filings increasing by a staggering 15.3%.