Patent & Trade Mark

Singapore raises the bar on post-grant amendments

Date: 29 July 2016
Author: Cameron Smith

The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) recently set a higher bar for allowance of post-grant amendments (circular available here).

Consequently, post-grant amendments may not be allowed if:

i)   a full disclosure of all relevant matters in relation to the proposed amendments was not provided by the patentee

ii)  there was an unreasonable delay in seeking the amendments, or

iii) an unfair advantage was obtained by delaying the amendments which the patentee knew to be needed.

The above requirements are additional to previous practice which dictated that amendments:

iv)  do not introduce additional matter, and

v)   do not extend the scope of protection.

The change in practice follows decisions in Ship's Equipment Centre Bremen GmbH v Fuji Trading (Singapore) Pty Ltd & Ors [2015] SGHC 159 and more recently Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 106 where the Singapore High Court affirmed the guidelines for allowance of post-grant amendments set down in the UK.

The above criteria will apply to all pending and new requests for post-grant amendments. Accordingly, patentees aware of prior art that is likely to affect their patent’s validity may wish to consider promptly applying for leave to amend their patent specification. Those with pending applications should consider addressing prior art which would impact the scope of their pending Singapore claims prior to grant stage.

Tags:  Singapore, Post-Grant Amendments

Circular - Updated Guidelines on the Assessment of Patent Post-Grant Amendments [Circular No. 1/2016, with effect from 30 June 2016]
Author: Intellectual Property Office of Singapore

Subscribe via Email